@editor The insider bickering has been a constant through the years. Wikipedia manages to keep going (and keep getting better) because of its editors. It's anarchy the way I always imagined our lives could be.
@scrivener The most interesting part of the criciticisms is how a calcified, bureaucratic, byzantine, opaque to newcomers governance structure has ultimately recreated itself inside an organization intended to be more open if not anarchic.
@editor Oh yeah, that. I...try to pretend it's not happening.
@scrivener I hear you. I caught a few misspellings of Hawaiian (as Hawaiin) and a couple of it's/its, but people are pretty on it for typos like that. I did create one new article, and against all odds, it's still standing five days later. New article mortality is very very high.
@editor What's your editor name?
@scrivener Ryanozawa, as I signed up before I knew any better. I have a pending request to change. You?
@editor Mitchell_k_dwyer mostly for the same reason. :)
@editor Wow you weren't kidding. 12 years since your last registered edit.
@scrivener Well, five edits in 2007, a 12 year gap, and 45 edits since May of this year! Only been reverted a couple of times, so feeling good about that.
All the news that's fit to toot. Sign up here.